Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add strong consistency check for data on disk #1604

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jan 15, 2025

Conversation

vibhansa-msft
Copy link
Member

@vibhansa-msft vibhansa-msft commented Jan 6, 2025

✅ What

Data being downloaded by block-cache is saved to local disk, if user choses to enable persistence. This feature is useful if application is reading the same files multiple times and we do not have enough in memory cache to hold all of them. When a block is downloaded it's saved on local disk. There are chances of accidental overwrite on the disk file which might corrupt the data. Later when same block is read by application Blobfuse will load the data from this disk file and end up serving corrupt data to user application.

Having a CRC check on the data when it was downloaded, protects us from those accidental corruptions.

🤔 Why

To provide strong data consistency checks and protect data persisted on local disk.

👩‍🔬 How to validate if applicable

If user choses to persist the downloaded content then this additional flag can provide and extra layer of security.

🔖 Related links

NA

README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@jainakanksha-msft
Copy link
Collaborator

jainakanksha-msft commented Jan 10, 2025

@vibhansa-msft Please add the whole use case to validate the scenario also add the correct links in the PR.

@jainakanksha-msft
Copy link
Collaborator

@vibhansa-msft , Do we need to update any public documentation for this new argument?
Additionally, do we need to verify our default config generation script
or any update in E2E test cases?

@vibhansa-msft vibhansa-msft merged commit 37149a5 into blobfuse/2.4.1 Jan 15, 2025
8 checks passed
@vibhansa-msft vibhansa-msft deleted the vibhansa/diskcrc branch January 15, 2025 12:02
vibhansa-msft added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2025
* feat: support workload identity token (#1556)

* feat: support workload identity token

* Create block pool only once in child process (#1581)

* create block pool in child only

* Update golang.org/x/crypto to v0.31.0 (#1594)

* Update golang.org/x/crypto to v0.31.0

* sync with main (#1603)

* updated year in copyright message (#1601)

* Use ListBlob for hns accounts  (#1555)

* Optimize HNS listing

* Added statfs for block-cache (#1470)

* Added statfs for block_cache

* Add strong consistency check for data on disk (#1604)

* Add strong consistency check for data on disk

* bug in block cache open call (#1580)

* current implementation of open file when opened in O_WRONLY will truncate the file to zero. This is incorrect behaviour.
We don't see it in the normal scenario as write-back cache is on by default. Hence all the open calls with O_WRONLY will be redirected O_RDWR.
To simulate this turn of the write-back cache and then open file in O_WRONLY.

* Feature: Blob filter (#1595)

* Integrating blob filter in azstorage

* Serve getAttr call for destination file after the Copy finishes from the cache

* Cleanup on start shall be set to cleanup temp cache (#1613)

* Add Tests

* Refactor the code and refresh the cache after copying the attributes

* Automate blobfuse2 setup for new VM (#1575)

added script for blobfuse setup and azsecpack setup in VM

* * Update the Unit tests.
* Refactor the Code

* Update Changelog

* do go fmt on src

* Downgrade go version to 1.22.7 due to memory issues in 1.23 (#1619)

* Enable ETAG based validation on every block download to provide higher consistency (#1608)

* Make etag validation a defualt option

* BUG#31069208:  Fixed Prefix filtering from File Path (#1618)

* Fixed the logic to filter out folder prefix from path
* Added/Updated/Removed test case

---------

Co-authored-by: weizhi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sourav Gupta <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Jan Jagusch <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: ashruti-msft <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: syeleti-msft <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: jainakanksha-msft <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants